top of page
Search

When Over-Collaboration Stalls Decision-Making: Finding the Balance in Modern Business

TL;DR:

Over-collaboration, while intended to foster inclusion and diverse input, often leads to decision-making paralysis. This article explores how to identify when collaboration becomes counterproductive, its impact on business agility, and practical strategies for leaders to re-establish clarity and decisiveness.

Flowchart titled "When Over-collaboration Leads to Indecision" shows steps: Over-collaboration, Too Many Stakeholders, Endless Discussions, Indecision.
Over-collaboration leads to indecision making

When Over-Collaboration Stalls Decision-Making: Finding the Balance in Modern Business

By Richard Keenlyside

Over the course of my career leading transformation in organisations across retail, finance, and manufacturing, I’ve seen collaboration serve as both a catalyst for innovation—and a cause of complete stagnation. While fostering open dialogue is undoubtedly valuable, there’s a tipping point. Beyond it lies organisational paralysis, where the pursuit of consensus slows progress to a crawl.


This growing phenomenon—over-collaboration—is becoming a silent killer of decision-making in today's complex businesses.


What Is Over-Collaboration?

Over-collaboration occurs when too many stakeholders are involved in decisions, meetings multiply without action, and consensus becomes the end rather than the means. It manifests as endless workshops, circular discussions, and layers of approval that add time, not value.

In transformation programmes I’ve led—whether restructuring legacy ERP environments or driving RPA adoption—I've seen first-hand how the drive for inclusivity can undermine urgency and clarity.


The Consequences of Too Much Collaboration

  1. Delayed Decisions: Critical actions are postponed as leaders seek universal agreement. A classic case in programme governance is when scope decisions go round in circles between functional heads, project teams, and steering groups—all trying to please everyone.

  2. Stakeholder Fatigue: Constant engagement without resolution drains energy. I've witnessed global programme teams suffer from meeting overload, where progress stalls because no one feels empowered to make final calls.

  3. Diluted Accountability: When “everyone owns the decision,” no one truly does. In matrix organisations, this is especially dangerous. Cross-functional teams often struggle with blurred boundaries and over-reliance on consensus.

  4. Loss of Competitive Agility: Businesses focused on pace and innovation can't afford indecision. In high-growth scenarios, such as the technology scale-ups I advise, hesitation can mean missed market opportunities.


Why Do Leaders Let It Happen?

Ironically, over-collaboration often stems from good intent—encouraging inclusivity, avoiding top-down mistakes, and promoting employee voice. But without structure, these intentions can backfire.


Culturally, organisations fear conflict. Avoiding tough calls under the guise of “alignment” is more palatable than making a bold decision that risks internal disagreement.

In digital transformations, this is magnified. With so many interdependencies between systems, functions, and geographies, leaders default to alignment as a risk mitigation tactic—but instead, they dilute focus and stall progress.


Finding the Right Balance

So, how can we encourage healthy collaboration without crossing the line into decision paralysis?

1. Clarify Roles and AuthorityUse RACI models religiously. Who is Responsible? Accountable? Who needs to be Consulted—and who merely Informed? The best-run programmes I’ve led make this explicit and stick to it.

2. Set Decision-Making CadenceDefine how and when decisions are made. Avoid “decision drift” by enforcing timelines. Agile ceremonies like sprint reviews can offer natural decision points if used well.

3. Empower Leaders to DecideMid-level leaders must be encouraged—and trusted—to make calls within defined guardrails. Holding all decisions at the top only encourages escalatory bottlenecks.

4. Embrace Disagreement—TemporarilyConstructive tension is healthy. I've seen better outcomes when divergent views are aired and resolved quickly, rather than swept under layers of consensus.

5. Implement Governance That Drives ActionGovernance isn’t just about oversight. Done right, it’s a mechanism to cut through complexity, not add to it. Define what gets escalated and what doesn’t.


A CIO’s Reflection

As CIO , overseeing IT across multiple territories and cultures, I have learnt that structured collaboration is essential. But it must be balanced with decisive leadership. When we transitioned 150 servers to Azure, reducing technical debt by £2 million, it happened because we empowered key decisions at the right levels—not because we sought universal agreement.


Similarly, in advisory roles with startups like Quollify or family-owned manufacturers like M.I. Dickson, the ability to act quickly on partial but strong evidence was a competitive advantage—not a risk.


FAQs

Q: How can you tell if your organisation is over-collaborating? Look for red flags such as slow decisions, repeated meetings without outcomes, and unclear ownership of actions.

Q: What are practical tools to manage over-collaboration? RACI charts, decision logs, time-boxed meetings, and decision matrices are excellent tools for streamlining input.

Q: Does agile methodology help avoid over-collaboration? Yes—if applied correctly. Agile frameworks promote fast, iterative decisions but still require disciplined role clarity and product ownership.

Q: Is over-collaboration more common in remote/hybrid teams? It can be. Remote teams often overcompensate for reduced visibility by increasing meetings and requiring wider input.


Final Thoughts

In today’s business environment, collaboration is vital—but not at the expense of progress. Great leaders know when to listen—and when to decide. The real skill lies not in gathering endless input, but in cutting through it with clarity.


As I often say in transformation circles: “Collaboration is the engine—but someone still needs to steer the wheel.”


Richard Keenlyside is the Global CIO for the LoneStar Group and a former IT Director for J Sainsbury’s PLC.



 
 
 

Commentaires

Noté 0 étoile sur 5.
Pas encore de note

Ajouter une note

Richard J. Keenlyside

  • alt.text.label.LinkedIn

©2025 - Richard J. Keenlyside (rjk.info)

bottom of page